In the latter, we don’t know that exactly happened, but the incident was portrayed as no big deal regardless. In the former case, the guy raped with intent. But he was just so good at sex that it was all good, right? In Sixteen Candles, nerdy guy had sex with blonde girl, who was so drunk/passed out that she didn’t even remember it, let alone give consent. In Revenge of the Nerds, the nerd had sex with a girl while wearing a mask, knowing full well that the girl thought that he was someone else. Revenge of the Nerds and Sixteen Candles both scenes of rape being treated as no big deal. Is he one of the biggest karmic Houdinis in film history? So my question is this - if George hadn’t intervened, would Biff have actually raped a clearly overpowered and protesting Lorraine? If so why in the blue hell are the two so happy with him in the new 1985, letting him around their family rather than avoiding a dangerous sex criminal (granted the '50s were a bit different, but I’d wager attempted rape would be a serious charge even back then)? We know that in 1985A in Back to the Future II alternate Biff is not above multiple murders (George then attempting to murder Marty).
Specifically, this scene, George punches Biff when he’s groping Lorraine in the car (the original plan being George saving Lorraine from Marty acting like a jackass, foiled by Biff finding him and locking him in a trunk as revenge for $300 damage to his car).
#Future biff cracked
As discussed by Cracked in reasons why Back to the Future is secretly horrifying, Biff Tannen goes from being a bullying supervisor in the original timeline to a kind of butler to the McFly family in the 1985 caused by Marty altering the timeline.
0 kommentar(er)
